Sunday, June 17, 2007
Movie Review - "Waitress" - Mothra 6.4
Saturday, June 16, 2007
In Loco Parentis
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
California Dreamin'...
Wednesday, May 09, 2007
Movie Review - "Snakes On A Plane" - Rating: Mothra 2.8
Saturday, May 05, 2007
Movie Review - "Fracture" - Rating: Mothra 7.4
Wednesday, May 02, 2007
Movie Reviews - A New Public Service
But She Won't Invite Him To Sit With the Kewl Kids
Best Magazine Cover Since Anna Nicole Was On The Cover of Playboy
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Hey, President Bush, I Want the Job.
- The war on drugs,
- The global war on terror,
- The war on immigration and immigrants,
- The war on voter fraud and the war on U.S. attorneys that don't prosecute such fraud when it would aid in reducing votes for the Democratic candidates,
- The war on Afghanistan and the search for Osama (you may have actually forgotten about this one, so forgive me if this one is irrelevant),
- The war on poverty (this may also be incorrect because this was put in place by a Democrat and then killed by a Republican, so it probably should just be referred to as the war on poor people),
- The war on Iraq, which is the crown jewel of achievements in your administration,
- The war on agencies and departments being operated for competence and for non-political reasons,
- The war on religion unless it is U.S. government sponsored,
- The war on abortion,
- The war on the other two branches of government,
- The war on telling kids any thing about sex except "keep it in your pants".
I may have missed one or two but because you are, by your own admission (and actions) a war president, you really need a war czar just to catalog and list your wars, if nothing else.
I know that several generals and others with "war" experience have run screaming from the room when you asked them about their interest in this position, but you shouldn't get discouraged because I am here for you. My resume is attached and from it you can see that I am every bit as qualified to be war czar as some of your other stellar appointments were for their posts. Brown, Bolton, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Roberts and Bremer spring to mind as well as the new U.S. attorneys. I believe I could follow in the very large footsteps made by these giants of efficiency and competence.
However, there as some things about me that you would not readily pick up from my resume that I believe are relevant about me and the way I think. I believe that you will share my enthusiasm for me after you read the following list.
First, I am white, male and middle aged. I have made large contributions to the Republican Party in the past, both in terms of contributing money and in terms of monitoring polling place to keep brown skinned people from voting and in monitoring Tricky Rick Perry's eye in the sky to tell on people risking their life to better their life. I never had the opportunity to attend such a fine preparatory school as Regent University so I had to actually go to a real law school and compete for a job. I don't like that and that's why I'm looking for this gig. I figure that I can stall in doing anything until you are out of office and Halliburton has met Wall Street's expectations for 6 or 7 more quarters. This will set you and Uncle Dick up fine for the long run and allow you to keep the promises to them and others you made when they selected you to be the figure head. I fully expect the Medal of Freedom for this effort.
Secondly, I hold many beliefs in common with other true believers (29% now?) in the grand Republican party.
For example, I believe that Jesus loves you and wanted you to be president, speaks to you regularly (you do hear those voices in your head still, don't you?) and shares your hatred of homosexuals and Hillary.
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
When Do We Mourn The Others?
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Burnished by Bush: Bill Clinton's Legacy
Lost (Pines) Weekend
Monday, March 26, 2007
Monday, March 19, 2007
Four Noir Years
- Almost anything (much too easy and glib, but true).
- Building on the unprecedented sympathy for the U.S. after 9/11 and the almost unanimous global support for effective action by the major nations of the world, the U.S. could have organized a cohesive group of major nations and the nations in the Middle East to effectively deal with the radical fringe that begets most of the terrorist actions. This could have been done by keeping the hearts and minds of the vast majority of the Muslim community that truly deplored and were horrified by the actions of the 9/11 terrorists. National consensus and the treating of the part of the Muslim community that had sympathy for us as partners rather than enemies would have done that. Let's face this realistically. You can't declare a "war on terror". Terror is a tactic, not an opponent. The advocates for this tactic generally arise from the citizenry. We will never have enough troops or police or be able to snoop on enough e-mails or phone calls or go through enough financial records to be even marginally effective against most such terrorists. A much more effective way would be for the vast majority of the citizenry from which such terrorists arise to be sympathetic to non-violent actions and to fail to provide the recruitment base and the haven for the terrorists. The only way for us to significantly improve our effectiveness against terrorists is to stop creating them by our inflammatory actions and make them so marginalized by their own community that they will be shunned and turned in by their friends and neighbors. The last four years has made them heroes and martyrs. You can't invade a sovereign country and destroy the fabric of its society and expect much cooperation from its people.
- Left Saddam Hussein in place and applied pressure through the consortium of nations to cause a regime change. He was effectively disarmed and was in a hold down mode through the use of the no-fly zones and the U.N. inspectors. It is unlikely that he would still be in power today if we had applied pressure like this. And we would not have paid the horrendous price in people and resources and squandered sympathy. Even if Saddam was still ostensibly in power today, we would be substantially better off and the Iraqis would be better off and capable of dealing with their own problems. We can not justify invading Iraq merely because Saddam was a dick. Following that theory would lead to the invasion of half the countries on the planet, starting with our own.
- Stabilized and fortified Afghanistan. Found Osama bin Laden and removed the terrorist training camps.
- Use the resources we squandered in Iraq to find better ways to secure our cities, ports, chemical facilities, infrastructure, etc. than we have done.
- Not eliminating the cornerstones of our own democracy while giving lip service to establishing it in other countries.
- Avoiding the politicizing of everything by the installation of cronies in agencies, courts, law enforcement, etc. Requiring something more than political allegiance as a qualification for appointment would have been a nice change.
If this were truly an effective pun, I could state that the "noir" years are coming to an end with a luminesence at the terminus of the underground labryinth. However, that tunnel seems just too freaking long and I'm afraid that by the time we reach the end, it will have all caved in.

