A couple of people took the time to read this little POS blog (Thank you very much) and comment on my recent post. They took me to task by suggesting that I had advocated doing away with the primaries and democracy in general. I really am in violent agreement with their positions, i.e. that we should have the most democratic and fair primaries possible (and let's not even start to talk about the bewilderment that are caucuses). I believe that the nominees should be elected by popular vote. It even seems to me to make sense to apportion the delegates by the overall popular vote in the state, rather than by congressional district, even though that may give cities a disproportional influence. I am opposed to the super delegate concept as that seems to be a mechanism to thwart the popular will.
So, the point I was really trying to make (perhaps fairly inartfully) by engaging in some hyperbole, is that the most important thing in this whole mess is to elect the Democratic nominee. We have the luxury of two great possibilities. If you are displeased with the manner in which the nominee is chosen, work to change it, but please don't stay home in November.
Because, if you would rather live in Pakistan, try 8 years of McCain and you won't even feel like you have to move.